Welcome to the first official posting under this new category. In these installments, Iâll be sharing science projects developed over many years while serving as The Science Mom at my local elementary school and in a community after-school program.  When my friend Jean Southland and I first started the in-class projects, the teacher invited us in on Mondays, to create a fun activity for that worst-of-days to students, the First Day of the School Week. We fooled around with ideas to give this extra science class a name and settled on Jeanâs simple and inviting âMessy Mondayâ. Since then, Jean moved on to wider-scale education duties, from teaching to administration, and she is now head of a local charter school. In the meantime, I continued with developing classroom-scale science projects and coaching a small robotics team.
When the youngest of my kids finally moved on from elementary school and my geek needs were being satisfied by playing with robots, I felt twinges of guilt that I was leaving the next round of students in the lurch. The most-frequent comments I heard when running science project sessions could be summarized as: âI could never do thatâ. Sometimes it was the teacher, in which case she/he would mean  âI can’t spare the time to figure out supply lists, shop for stuff, sort out materials, and test procedures.â Other times, it was another parent, in which case the meaning was either  âI could do that, if only someone would explain what itâs supposed to meanâ or âI understand the science, but someone needs to give me a checklist to follow.â  And in these times, potential cost is always a concern, as most supplemental projectsâfrom field trips to science experimentsâend up being funded by parents or from teachersâ own pockets.
In these episodes, Iâll be having a stab at meeting both sets of needs. With any luck, the end result will be a book of ârecipesâ for science projects with enough information provided for teachers to slot into their curricula in order to satisfy the science standards they must meet, with clear supply lists to distribute to classroom-helper parents, and with step-by-step instructions for completing projects that any interested parent or teacher will be able to not only follow but build upon to suit their own audiences. While (like every other blog in the Known Universe) the ultimate result is to be a book of projects that a teacher or parent helper could have at hand, in the short term, there will be first, these erratic blog entries and second, a series of leaflet-style e-docs in a more readable/printable form, to be available from the usual e-book suppliers. Think of the blog entries as the beta version, the leaflets as the Basic Edition release, and the eventual book as the Portmanteau Edition, with updates, extensions, and add-on packs as needed.
To open the subject, Iâll be delivering a flurry of quick posts to get things started, but then will back off to a more regular pace. The goal is to deliver one project-worth of information in no more than two weeks.
Every Messy Monday project guide has four key components:
 A set of notes for project leaders, sketching the key elements of the project and the science topic it is meant to address
A detailed supply list, structured to make it simple to purchase supplies for either a one-shot demonstration or for a classroom-sized group activity.
A set of instructions for working through the project with students, including commentary to help cope with common classroom-management issues, questions that are likely to arise, and issues to keep in mind from safety to fairness.
A rough estimate of the cost to run the project.
So, letâs get started with a truly cometary project…
In this activity, the most importantidea is to explore and experiment with models and games to understand how a cometâs tail behaves as the comet hurtles around the sun. The key concept is that the cometâs tail is being pushed away from the sun by the ionizing radiation, solar wind and even the light itself blasting out of the sun. This means that when the comet is inbound, approaching the sun, its tail streams behind it, like a horseâs tail. But on the outbound journey, as the comet leaves the sun behind, its tail flies out in front of it. What we hope the participants will take away from these activities is a picture of what a comet looks like as it moves and the knowledge of why it looks that way.
Comet-tail behavior simply makes sense when âexperiencedâ from the cometâs point of view. If by any chance some of these facts are a discovery for you, too, donât feel like you have to keep it a secret that you are learning–have fun with it. A key ingredient in the formula for growing a scientist is that finding out how the universe works is fun. Or, in the words of one physicist profiled in the film Particle Fever: The real answer to âwhy do we do this is . . . because itâs cool.â)
Keep in mind the constraints of your particular situation when assembling your materials and pre-planning the project. For instance, if there arenât enough classroom scissors or if session time is tightly constrained, you can pre-cut the ribbon for the individual comet models into 3-foot lengths. Be aware of opportunities for participants with special needsâfor instance, the comet-running activity does require at least one person to be standing still. In return, that one who just canât stand still could be a pinch-runner. If the group as a whole isnât particularly fast-moving, the ârunningâ game can be done at whatever pace suits the team.  (One can be a âstudentâ at any ageâmost of us middle-aged folks are not exactly speed-demons.) If you’re planning this as a home-schooling project, this is one you’ll want to save for a get-together with other home-schoolers–you need at least three players and it is ever so much more fun with a group.
Stage 1: The Small-Scale Experiment
This description may look long, but that’s just to let you walk through it easily and to share some photos to help. This whole Stage 1 should take about fifteen minutes, tops.  I’ll spare your weary eyes and park the “Stage 2” and “Stage 3” activities in the next posting–but don’t worry, the entire activity fits into a single science session if you can claim an hour’s time to play with.
Before distributing materials, bring out one individual model comet, the sample to be used for the models everyone will take home. Itâs simply an ordinary badminton birdie with long streamers of ribbon tied to it. For now, keep the ribbons bunched up inside the net of the birdie. Explain that the ball at the end of the birdie is the cometâs nucleus, the frilly part can be its atmosphere, or coma, which begins to form as the gas and dust which jets away from the outer layers comet as it warms up.
One Small Comet
Notes: Iâd suggest that you relax and let your sample comet be imperfectâcomets are messy creatures by nature and you donât need that one super-meticulous individual slowing down the whole event by striving to exactly matching a perfect sample. If you have an older, more experienced group of comet enthusiasts to work with, you can interject the extra information about the distinction between the ion and dust tailsâperhaps even represent them by different ribbon colors.On the other hand, if youâre working with anyone between the ages of 5 and 15, and you donât want to deal with distracting snickers and giggles erupting through the group, simply refrain from using the technical term for a birdie. Oh, come on, you know why.
OK, back to it. The ribbon represents those gases and dust particles that make up the cometâs tail(s). Now, if we toss our model across the room, what happens to the streamers tied to it? Right . . . they float out behind. They donât stretch out in front or clump in a bunch around the head of the âbirdieâ. You can demonstrate by trying to throw your comet backwards: hold the tail in front and toss, but the tail will just fall back to the head andâif your throw is a mighty oneâend up in back again..
Now, invite answers to a key question: why does the ribbon float behind? What pushes the tail behind the cone as it flies through the room? With a little nudging, you should get general agreement that it is the air pushing on the lightweight streamers, shoving them behind the âheadâ of our comet.
But now we must turn to a more difficult line of questioning. Pull out playground or soccer ball (a handy model for the sun), and ask one student to stand and hold up your Sun so everyone can see the next portion. Bunch up the cometâs tail in the back of the shuttlecock again, and carry the comet in a âflightâ around the âSunâ. As you move, ask the students to think hard about what happens to the cometâs tail as it whips around the sun.
Start easy. Shake out the streamers, and stretch them out with your free hand. Move the comet towards the sun. Which way should I point the streamers? Everyone will be quick to tell you to pull them backwards, away from the sun. Now, place the comet at its closest approach to the sun, just before it curves back to head into deep space again. âIâm at the Sun now,â you can say, âzooming around the back of it. And moving as fast as Iâll go in this journey. Which way should the streamers point?â
Usually this question generates some disagreement. A reasonable argument would be that you should hold the streamers behind the comet, as it moves, which would mean the cometâs tail would point along a tangent to its orbit around the Sun. (Even if the students are covering tangents in math, please donât interrupt yourself to pause and discuss tangents right now! Use this lesson later to enliven the math session.)
Tail Behind?
Tail In Front?
Tail Sideways?
Some students may suggestâquite logically–that when you are that close, the Sunâs gravity should pull the tail towards it. If the group is large enough, you should also get someone who can argue that the tail should point away from the sunâfor now, it doesnât matter if this is a knowledge-based claim or just a contrarian viewpoint from snarkiest person in the room. Whatever hypotheses are offered, just accept them as proposed solutions and demonstrate what each would look like.
Finally, move to the âoutboundâ portion of your cometâs orbit. âOur comet now flies on away from the sun, perhaps to return in another century or two. Now, which way should the cometâs tail point?â Again, if you have managed to keep a poker face so far, the most popular answer is likely have the tail streaming behind the comet. As before, accept and demonstrate each of the guesses. If students have reasons for their theories, let everyone hear them. Discussing and justifying hypotheses is an integral part of the real scientific process.
If you have access to a blackboard (oh, well, itâs modern times, so, okayokayokay, you can use your smelly whiteboard or that fancy tablet-linked projector), now is the moment to leave off demonstrating with the model and sketch the competing hypotheses for everyone to see. Your picture will look kind of like this. Please remember to Keep It Messy.
Discussing Possible Tail Directions
Have you ever read one of those annoying mystery stories in which the author leaves you in the dark about a critical fact that solves the entire case? Well, here too, we have denied our puzzle-solvers an important clue. So, tell the group itâs time for a change of topic. But actually what weâre doing is rolling out the narrative twist that makes the whole thing so cool.
Here on Earth, it is air that pushes the streamers on our comet model. But how much air is there out in space? (So little that you might as well say âzeroâ!) But without air, why should any comet have a tail at all?
What comes out of the sun? You should hear the following answers: heat, light, maybe even radiation. But has anyone heard of the solar wind? The sun blasts out particles, too? The sun is shooting out plasma, protons and electrons flying through the solar system at thousands of miles per hour. This is the solar wind, which blows through the solar system all the time, at thousands of miles per hour. The particles are tiny, not even as big as atoms, so it is an invisible wind. And like wind, itâs not perfectly even, it gusts and changes from moment to moment as the Sun itself changes.
All of those things we named help to make our comets look the way they do. Consider your audienceâŚ
Explanation #1: You are all correct. All of that stuff blasting out of the sun–light, radiation, heat, and the solar wind–shove all that stuff leaking out of the comet into a tail. And since all that stuff is coming from the sun, the only way the tail can point is away from the sun.
Explanation #2: All of those answers are correct . . . and they all combine to make a cometâs tail. The heat of the sun warms the comet to free the gases and dust. The solar wind blasts the gasesâand the particles in the solar wind also interact with those gases, stripping some of their electrons to make that part of the tail a glowing stream of ionized gas. The radiation from the sun actually can push things, and that pressure is just strong enough to shove those tiny dust particles enough to counteract their tendency to fall towards the sun. And the visible sunlight reflects from the spread-out cloud of dust, making the comet shine in our night sky.
Again, with older/experienced participants, now is the time to clue them in that radiation pressureâthe totally cool idea that sunlight itself exerts pressureâexists because light is electromagnetic radiation and electromagnetic radiation is a wave and a wave [http://physics.info/em-waves/] pushes on the objects it encounters. You may not feel battered and bruised by the TV and radio waves powering through you day and night or be physically bowled over by the sunlight forming a gorgeous rainbow. But: itâs enough to push fine grains of dust. The only sad thing about radiation pressure is itâs not common knowledge yetâitâs been proven since 1873.
To represent these solar forces, we need to make a breeze. For that job, a fan does the trick. When we turn it on, it blasts a healthy âsolarâ wind. (Be sure to experiment in advance with your fan and sample comet–there’s a lot of variation in fan settings.)
Inbound Comet
Hold the comet in the âinboundâ position, with the front of the birdie pointed at the Fan Sun. Yes! We were all correct: the tail points behind the comet as it moves towards the sun.
If the fan is strong enough, you can also use the model to hint at how the length of the cometâs tail changes. Far from the sun, the comet has no tail; far from the fan, our streamers dangle to the floor. A little closer in, a real comet’s tail appears as a pale streak behind it; as you approach your fan, the model’s streamers lift up and begin to flutter weakly behind it. Near the sun, the tail stretches out millions of miles behind a real cometâs head; near the fan, the your streamers stretch their full length.
Now, what about when the comet is heading away from the sun? Which way will the tail be pointing, now that we know about the solar “wind”? Nearly everyone will see, now, that it must point away from the sun.
Outbound Comet
Demonstrate that this works: you point the birdieâs nose away from the fan, turn on the blast, and the streamers flow out over the front of the birdie. The shape of the birdie helps emphasize the incongruity of our expectationâthat the tail goes behindâwith the reality: the solar forces push the tail.
If the class has patience for one more test, add the third question: what happens when the comet is rounding the far side of the sun, and is pointed âsidewaysâ? Hold the comet model perpendicular to the flow of the fan.
Comet At Perihelion
Let everyone see how the tail sweeps out to the side of the comet. It always points away from the sun, no matter what direction the comet is pointing.
This category of the blog is dedicated to science & technology topics that I think may interest my fellow nerds.
(Note: Original post: 2012. A few updates were made during site reorganization in January, 2021.)
For starters, I’ll be posting in the blog regularly under Astronomy & Astrophysics. (In some of these older posts the category is tagged Pixel Gravity.) To jump straight to those posts, visit the PG Archive–readily accessible in the menu. For some time now, I’ve been running the social-media support for the program that made the picture you see here. I’ve been posting about robots, space exploration, astronomy, big steps in physics, and so on. Sometimes, the space available for a posting on Facebook is too restrictive. So those kinds of discussions will move here.
What qualifies me to write about this stuff? Well, I’ve admitted elsewhere that we are a family of hypernerds. That’s not my term. It was invented and applied by one of our charming (adult) offspring. It’s not a misnomer As a family, we are 40% engineers and 60% scientists.
I’m a power systems engineer, which in my case means I’ve made a career out of simulating how power plants and electric and gas networks operate.
My husband is a computational physicist, specializing in solar physics. Want to know what’s going on inside the sun? He’s your guy.
Our youngest son is too busy for now, building catapults and robots on his way to a mechanical-engineering degree at UC Santa Barbara. (Update: graduated, with honors. Currently open to job offers.)
After two summer internships in NASA’s astrobiology group, our middle son is working on an honors thesis project on metabolic processes of microbes in deep serpentine wells, attracted by the prospect of doing biology fieldwork in extreme ecosystems right here on planet Earth. (Update: he’s now nearly done with his Ph.D.)
And the oldest escaped from UC Berkeley’s astrophysics program with a degree and a desire to never return to academia. He built Pixel Gravity instead.
What’s “Pixel Gravity“? It’s a detailed, graphical astrophysics simulator with real-time controls. It looks sort of like a game, and it’s fun to play with, but it’s also a serious science tool As an ânâbodyâ simulator, it lets users model complex groups of many objects, from the solar system to galaxies. Most of the other easy-to-use programs available online limit the number of objects or lack physical accuracy, so (for example) relativistic effects on motion near a black hole are not handled properly, if at all. University researchers have access to extremely-detailed models, but those require supercomputers. Pixel Gravity provides accurate modeling on personal computers and is priced low so that even students can explore gravity in action. In addition to Newtonian gravity, Pixel Gravity models the additional effects of atmospheric drag, general relativity, and dark-matter, as well as user-defined forces. Plus, the software package includes helpful tools for curriculum development such as a tutorial-builder and video-production capability. (Update: Pixel Gravity is at present a retired product–contact us if you’d like a copy to play with.)
So, in short, the topics under this heading are just the kind of things we talk about at our house. So if you come to dinner, you don’t need to bring a foodie specialty. But you might scan the latest issue of Scientific American.
A Top-Down Search for the Strange Charm of Putting Up With Those Quarks at Bottom of the Universe
For part two of our universe-construction project, while the helium models dry, it’s time to delve into the depths of the sub-sub-atomic universe.
Consider those carefully-constructed model atoms.  Each contains protons, neutrons, and electrons.
As it turns out, with electrons, there are (so far as physics can determine at present) no smaller particles needed to build an electron. Electrons are part of a group of six elementary particles called leptons. Some of these leptons–the neutrinos–were predicted to not even have any mass, but experiments have shown that while they are incredibly low-mass, neutrinos do have some mass. Interestingly, these experiments leading to even more new developments in fundamental physics and the Standard Model theory. Still, electrons are by far the most numerous leptons (at least in our corner of the multiverse.)
In our candy-based model, we have more than one proton crammed into in a nucleus. Each of those protons has a positive charge, but we all know that objects with the same charge repel each other. Why does the nucleus stay together?
In our model, of course, there is all that sticky candy. But in the real atom, there is also something that, in its own way, makes protons stick together. These other particles are one type of another class of matter, called mesons. These strange, essential, particles are stable only inside the nucleus, where (like our sticky marshmallows) they act as a “glue” to hold protons and neutrons close together.
Given that extremely tiny leptons have been observed, as well as tiny mesons inside the nucleus, protons and neutrons may begin to seem too big to be elementary particles. Sure enough, it turns out that protons and neutrons are also made of smaller particles. And those mesons, too, are made of those same even-smaller particles. And, while it took thirty years to search them all out, a total of six more fundamental particles (on top of the six leptons) have been found. Most of the matter we know about only requires two of those particles–plus the electron–but modern physics predicted six, and sure enough, there are six of them.
Meet the QUARKS. Their six kinds are: up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom. Each kind comes in a matter form and an antimatter form.
Intriguingly, the terminology for “kinds” of quarks is flavors. Other characteristics of quarks and leptons include color, another clue to the pleasure scientists find in these discoveries.  For now, we’ll experiment with the flavors of quarks. Unlike real quarks, we will use macroscopic objects that also happen to taste sweet.
As usual, if you’re working with youngsters, begin by reassuring everyone that there will be plenty of time to eat their quarks later. Each person gets one each of the six flavors of candy…quarks. Because the candies will be handled a lot during the first stage, tell them not to open the wrappers yet.  Observe the candies. One side has the brand name on it, and the other side is plain. If we put the candy name-side up, we’ll call it a quark, and if it has the plain side up, we’ll call it an antiquark.
Quark vs Antiquark
A meson is formed by pairs of one quark and one antiquark. Give the group some time to see just how many combinations can be made of such pairs. (A few special mesons combine two or three such pairs, in quark combinations.)
A Small Set of Mesons
This will take some cooperation–participants will want to get together and different groups will organize their tests differently. Meanwhile, if you have access to a whiteboard or poster paper, you can sketch out a list of simple mesons shown below. For smaller (or older) groups, you can also pass out copies of this grid and let everyone check off the combinations as they are discovered.
quark
antiquark
candy (name)
candy (plain)
bottom eta
b
b
pineapple
pineapple
Upsilon
b
b
pineapple
pineapple
charmed eta
c
c
purple
purple
D+
c
d
purple
peppermint
D0
c
u
purple
red
J/Psi
c
c
purple
purple
Strange D
c
s
purple
green
Charmed B
b
c
purple
pineapple
Kaon0
d
s
peppermint
green
B0
d
b
peppermint
pineapple
Phi
s
s
green
green
Strange B
s
b
green
pineapple
pion
u
d
red
peppermint
kaon+
u
s
red
green
B+
u
b
red
pineapple
Charged rho
u
d
red
peppermint
Kaon*+
u
s
red
green
What’s important from this exercise is realizing that all of these two-quark combinations can really happen. Some of the mesons are the ones that help stick nuclei together. Others are found in outer space, as cosmic rays. Others are only found when scientists smash other particles together to find out what they are made of. Recently, the last of the mesons described by this model was detected by an international team of physicists, using the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, in  Switzerland. This prompted huge celebrations by physicists and the process inspired a documentary film about the search for the Higgs Boson, Particle Fever.
When I ran this project at BayCon in 2017, one of the young participants scanned the list above and said, “What about the top quark?” Trust a science-fiction fan to spot an anomaly. Indeed, none of the known mesons make use of the top quark, which is the most elusive one of all, and in some ways the most peculiar. The top quark is extremely unstable–even more ephemeral than the strange, charm, and bottom quarks–and it requires a large particle accelerator to observe one. (Fermilab managed it first; now CERN‘s Large Hadron Collider holds the record.) Even then, once produced, a top quark vanishes in 1/1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000th of a second. The top quark is also amazingly massive, fueling the deep interest in the nature of mass itself, which many think is one of the functions of the Higgs boson, which itself has only recently been (tentatively) observed. Scientists at CERN hope to use the relatively massive top quark as a test laboratory to verify their (provisional) Higgs boson observations.
Three-quark particles are called baryons–the most common of these are protons and neutrons. The next step for our own quark exploration is to find the combination of up and down quarks that yields the proton and the one that forms a neutron.  Each person has 2 peppermint and 2 of one other color to play with. Each group can also pool resources (still keeping those candy wrappers on) to mix and match groups of three using only 2 colors of candy.
To sort out which of these combinations works requires one extra piece of information. We know that an electron has a charge of -1, a proton has a charge of +1, and a neutron is neutral, with a charge of zero.  Another cool feature of quarksâŚand one of the hardest things their discoverers had to come to terms withâŚis that they have fractional charges. Before quarks, everyone used to think of a chargeâŚequal to the electric charge of an electronâŚas an indivisible thing. Just like an atom. But just as it has turned out that atoms aren’t indivisible, neither is charge.
Up quark’s charge:Â Â Â Â Â Â +2/3
Down quark’s charge: Â Â -1/3
So, with just a little arithmetic, we can find out which of our combinations makes a proton and which makes a neutron. Here’s the cheat sheet:
uuu
2/3 + 2/3 + 2/3 = 2
Positive…but too much for a proton
ddd
(-1/3) + (-1/3) + (-1/3) = -1
Negative, so it can’t be a proton or a neutron.
Note:Â it’s not an electron either–remember, an electron is already an elementary particle.
uud
or udu
or duu
2/3 + 2/3 + (-1/3) = 1
OK! Itâs a proton!
(Just a reminder…the order the quarks are listed in doesn’t matter.)
ddu
or dud
or udd
-1/3 + (-1/3) + 2/3 = 0
Yes! We have discovered the neutron!
Aha, it’s a proton.
Aha, It’s a neutron!
So, the charge calculations show that protons and neutrons are made of two ups plus one down for a proton and two downs plus one up for a neutron.
It’s possible to have participants glue their protons and neutron quark groups together. A dip on the water cup from the atomic marshmallow project will make a candy piece sticky. However, these sticky messes will need to sit aside for a while to dry. If your participants include young children, you might want to skip that possibility, as a glued-up stack of Life-Savers could be a choking hazard.
Speaking of glue, the same BayCon2017 participants also suggested some ideas for incorporating gluons into our model. To cover the topic of quantum chromodynamics would be a fun challenge, but for the present, those lonely orange LifeSavers we’d set aside as those transient top quarks can be added between the red and white candies in our proton and neutron models to represent the color exchanges among the quarks.
So now we have established that everything in matter is made of tiny (and flavorful) points of dancing energy called quarks and leptons. How can we visualize the true relative sizes of these quarks, protons, nuclei, and atoms?
Poke a pin through a piece of paper and hold it up to the light, then pass it around, so everyone can see how tiny that hole is.  Think of that bright speck as an electron or a quark. To be at the same scale, our helium nucleus would be about 3 feet across. A handy meter-stick or yardstick will provide a sense of scale, but for drama, bring out a huge balloon (the 36-inch size). It won’t be edible, but it will be fun to play with afterwards. If that big old balloon is the tiny nucleus, then to build a whole helium atom we’d need a marshmallow about seven miles (ten kilometers) across!
So letâs check back on our atom model from the atomic marshmallow project. It’s mostly nothing, just that airy, fluffy marshmallow. Remember how thin the âshellâ of the electron cloud is, and how surprisingly hard it is to notice the tiny nucleus once the two little protons and neutrons were placed inside. Even so, in our model, the protons and neutrons are huge compared with the atom. Imagine how fantastic the resulting candy treat would be–and how many people could enjoy it–if we’d tried to make this marshmallow atom model to scale.